Like most other GeForce FX 5200 Ultra cards, Inno3D’s rendition appears to follow NVIDIA’s reference design, so the Tornado will have to rely on bundled extras and low prices in order to compete. You can find a more comprehensive analysis of the chip in my GeForce FX 5200 review and preview of NVIDIA’s NV31 and NV34 graphics chips.įor gamers on a budget, the GeForce FX 5200 Ultra should be a pretty appealing option. Without advanced lossless compression schemes, NV34 doesn’t make as efficient use of the bandwidth it has available, which reduces the chip’s overall effective fill rate (or pixel-pushing power). The lack of color compression should hamper the chip’s performance primarily with antialiasing enabled, but the lack of Z compression will hurt across the board. No color or Z compression – Unlike the rest of the NV3X line, NV34 can’t do color or Z compression.NVIDIA’s use of 0.15-micron technology will set NV34’s core clock speed ceiling lower than it perhaps could be with a 0.13-micron chip, which would also consume less power, but 0.15-micron technology makes sense for relatively budget parts like the GeForce FX 52 Ultra. Manufacturing process – NVIDIA’s other NV3X graphics chips are built using new 0.13-micron process technology, but NV34 is built using older and more established 0.15-micron technology.However, NV34 differs from the rest of the NV3x line in a couple of key ways: Like NV31, which is used in NVIDIA’s GeForce FX 5600 series, NV34 has four pixel pipelines capable of laying down one texture per rendering pass. NV34 occupies the low end of NVIDIA’s GeForce FX line, and it offers DirectX 9-class pixel and vertex shader programs. The GeForce FX 5200 Ultra uses NVIDIA’s NV34 graphics chip, which I described in my GeForce FX 5200 review back in April. Does it deliver on the GeForce FX 5200 Ultra’s potential? Is it fast enough to challenge the GeForce FX 5600 or the competition from ATI? The answers might surprise you. Today we’re looking at Inno3D’s Tornado GeForce FX 5200 Ultra. The Ultra bolsters the GeForce FX 5200’s core clock speed by 75MHz and memory clock by 150MHz, which makes it look more competitive, on paper, with NVIDIA’s mid-range GeForce FX 5600 than with its sub-$70 sibling.
Thus, I had a renewed interest in NVIDIA’s GeForce FX 5200 Ultra.
#NVIDIA GEFORCE FX 5200 DRIVERS#
However, the drivers did dramatically improve performance in many applications without degrading image quality or otherwise breaking any rules. Cheats and optimizations for 3DMark03 in the Detonator FX drivers created some controversy.
To cure the GeForce FX line’s performance woes, NVIDIA released the Detonator FX 44.03 drivers. Sure the chip supported all sorts of DirectX 9 goodies, but feature compatibility with DirectX 9 doesn’t guarantee competitive or even competent performance in DirectX 9-class applications or older games. deep scratches, severe dents, cracks or bends.W HEN NVIDIA first introduced the GeForce FX 5200, its performance was horrid. The article shows significant signs of use, e.g. several moderate scratches, small cracks or discoloration. The article shows clear signs of use, e.g. occasional small, superficial scratches or signs of use. The article shows only minor signs of use, e.g. The article shows no or only minimal signs of use. It was then assigned to one of the following quality levels: All components have been thoroughly cleaned inside and out. This product was subjected to a precise optical audit and preparation.
#NVIDIA GEFORCE FX 5200 FREE#
If a problem occurs during the guarantee period, we will repair the product free of charge within the framework of our guarantee conditions, exchange the product or refund the purchase price.Ģ. You can try the product for 1 month and send it back free of charge. This product has passed our rigorous technical quality inspection, which includes 40 component-level control points. This product has been professionally checked, completely overhauled and reset to the factory condition by our experts.
0 kommentar(er)
